adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What happens if an attacker's string is internally converted into Unicode before it reaches the vulnerable function?

a.

The attacker must feed the vulnerable program a sequence of ASCII characters that would become a workable shellcode once converted into Unicode.

b.

The attacker can bypass the buffer length check.

c.

The caller can supply a string that is too long for the target buffer.

d.

The vulnerable program becomes less vulnerable to overflow attacks.

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (a).The attacker must feed the vulnerable program a sequence of ASCII characters that would become a workable shellcode once converted into Unicode. Explanation:If an attacker's string is internally converted into Unicode before it reaches the vulnerable function, the attacker must feed the vulnerable program a sequence of ASCII characters that would become a workable shellcode once converted into Unicode.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What happens if an attacker's string is internally converted into Unicode before it reaches the vulnerable function?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the most common example of string-related overflow attacks?

Q. What are heap overflows and why are they less common than stack overflows?

Q. What is the risk of using the strcpy function?

Q. What is the most common example of overflow attacks?

Q. Why are heap overflows less common than stack overflows?

Q. How can attackers take advantage of the heap's linked-list structure?

Q. What causes the program to crash in a heap overflow attack?

Q. How are heaps arranged?

Q. How does a heap overflow attack work?

Q. What is a heap overflow?

Q. What is the purpose of stack-checking mechanisms embedded into programs?

Q. Which type of vulnerability is required for an attacker to exploit the buffer overflow bug?

Q. Which option is used for returning values to the caller in functions?

Q. What is the most popular strategy for attackers to overcome the hurdles imposed by nonexecutable memory systems?

Q. Does nonexecutable memory completely eliminate the problem of buffer overflow attacks?

Q. Which operating systems support nonexecutable memory?

Q. Which processors provide support for nonexecutable memory?

Q. What is nonexecutable memory?

Q. How can an attacker defeat stack checking?

Q. Can stack checking completely eliminate the problem of buffer overflow bugs?