Question
a.
Because the sizes of heap blocks are almost always dynamically calculated to be large enough to fit incoming data
b.
Because programmers hard-code the size of a heap block when they have variably sized incoming data
c.
Because the pointers to the next and previous heap blocks are placed either right before or right after the actual block data
d.
Because heap blocks become a problem when the programmer miscalculates the number of bytes needed to hold a particular user-supplied buffer in memory
Posted under Reverse Engineering
Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment
Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.
Know the Explanation? Add it Here.
Q. Why are heap overflows less common than stack overflows?
Similar Questions
Discover Related MCQs
Q. What is the most common example of overflow attacks?
View solution
Q. What is the risk of using the strcpy function?
View solution
Q. What are heap overflows and why are they less common than stack overflows?
View solution
Q. What is the most common example of string-related overflow attacks?
View solution
Q. What happens if an attacker's string is internally converted into Unicode before it reaches the vulnerable function?
View solution
Q. What are integer overflows?
View solution
Q. What is the risk associated with adding a constant value to a user-supplied buffer length?
View solution
Q. What happens if the addition performed on the buffer length parameter overflows?
View solution
Q. Why do stack variables always have a fixed size?
View solution
Q. What is a heap overflow?
View solution
Suggested Topics
Are you eager to expand your knowledge beyond Reverse Engineering? We've curated a selection of related categories that you might find intriguing.
Click on the categories below to discover a wealth of MCQs and enrich your understanding of Computer Science. Happy exploring!