adplus-dvertising

Welcome to the Breaking Protections MCQs Page

Dive deep into the fascinating world of Breaking Protections with our comprehensive set of Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs). This page is dedicated to exploring the fundamental concepts and intricacies of Breaking Protections, a crucial aspect of Reverse Engineering. In this section, you will encounter a diverse range of MCQs that cover various aspects of Breaking Protections, from the basic principles to advanced topics. Each question is thoughtfully crafted to challenge your knowledge and deepen your understanding of this critical subcategory within Reverse Engineering.

frame-decoration

Check out the MCQs below to embark on an enriching journey through Breaking Protections. Test your knowledge, expand your horizons, and solidify your grasp on this vital area of Reverse Engineering.

Note: Each MCQ comes with multiple answer choices. Select the most appropriate option and test your understanding of Breaking Protections. You can click on an option to test your knowledge before viewing the solution for a MCQ. Happy learning!

Breaking Protections MCQs | Page 5 of 7

Explore more Topics under Reverse Engineering

Discuss
Answer: (a).To monitor the hardware time-stamp counter and prevent the process from being stopped by a debugger. Explanation:The purpose of the Processor Time-Stamp Verification Thread in Defender is to monitor the hardware time-stamp counter and prevent the process from being stopped by a debugger.
Discuss
Answer: (b).So that crackers cannot hook or replace the function that obtains the value. Explanation:The direct access to the hardware time-stamp counter using a low-level instruction such as RDTSC makes it difficult for crackers to hook or replace the function that obtains the value, which helps to make the process of live debugging on the protected application more difficult.
Discuss
Answer: (b).The program would be easier to crack by loading it in a disassembler and reading the code. Explanation:If encryption was not implemented on each key function in the Processor Time-Stamp Verification Thread, the program would be easier to crack by loading it in a disassembler and reading the code. Without encryption, the verification thread would not be effective in preventing reverse engineering.
Discuss
Answer: (d).All of the abbove Explanation:The modifications that can be made to a time-stamp verification thread to make it more difficult to remove are adding periodical checksum calculations from the main thread that verify the verification thread, storing checksums within the code, rather than in some centralized location, inlining the actual checksum verifications, and storing a global handle to the verification thread.
Q45.
Is the current implementation of the verification thread safe for commercial use?
Discuss
Answer: (b).No Explanation:In its current implementation, the verification thread is slightly dangerous. It is reliable enough for a cracking exercise, but not for anything beyond that.
Discuss
Answer: (b).It should be significantly higher Explanation:In a commercial product environment, the counter constant should probably be significantly higher.
Q47.
What priority should the verification thread be set to in a commercial product environment?
Discuss
Answer: (c).High priority Explanation:In a commercial product environment, the thread should be set to a higher priority in order to make sure higher priority threads don't prevent it from receiving CPU time and generate false positives.
Q48.
What is the purpose of adding periodical checksum calculations from the main thread?
Discuss
Answer: (a).To verify the verification thread. Explanation:Adding periodical checksum calculations from the main thread can verify the verification thread.
Discuss
Answer: (c).To make it more difficult to eliminate the checks or modify the checksum. Explanation:Inlining the actual checksum verifications would make it very difficult to eliminate the checks or modify the checksum.
Discuss
Answer: (c).The counter constant should be higher and should probably be calculated in runtime based on the counter’s update speed. Explanation:In a commercial product environment, the counter constant should probably be higher and should probably be calculated in runtime based on the counter’s update speed.
Page 5 of 7

Suggested Topics

Are you eager to expand your knowledge beyond Reverse Engineering? We've curated a selection of related categories that you might find intriguing.

Click on the categories below to discover a wealth of MCQs and enrich your understanding of Computer Science. Happy exploring!