Welcome to the Antireversing Techniques MCQs Page

Dive deep into the fascinating world of Antireversing Techniques with our comprehensive set of Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs). This page is dedicated to exploring the fundamental concepts and intricacies of Antireversing Techniques, a crucial aspect of Reverse Engineering. In this section, you will encounter a diverse range of MCQs that cover various aspects of Antireversing Techniques, from the basic principles to advanced topics. Each question is thoughtfully crafted to challenge your knowledge and deepen your understanding of this critical subcategory within Reverse Engineering.

Check out the MCQs below to embark on an enriching journey through Antireversing Techniques. Test your knowledge, expand your horizons, and solidify your grasp on this vital area of Reverse Engineering.

Note: Each MCQ comes with multiple answer choices. Select the most appropriate option and test your understanding of Antireversing Techniques. You can click on an option to test your knowledge before viewing the solution for a MCQ. Happy learning!

Antireversing Techniques MCQs | Page 4 of 15

Explore more Topics under Reverse Engineering

01

Introduction to Reverse Engineering

02

Low Level Software 🔒

03

Windows Fundamentals 🔒

04

Reversing Tools 🔒

05

Beyond the Documentation

06

Deciphering File Formats

07

Auditing Program Binaries 🔒

08

Reversing Malware 🔒

09

Piracy and Copy Protection

10

Breaking Protections 🔒

11

Reversing .NET 🔒

12

Decompilation

13

Deciphering Code Structures 🔒

14

Understanding Compiled Arithmetic

15

Deciphering Program Data 🔒

Q31.

Are antidebugger tricks without risks?

Yes, antidebugger tricks are always without risks.

No, antidebugger tricks are risky because they can sometimes generate false positives and cause the program to malfunction even though no debugger is present.

It depends on the specific antidebugger trick used.

None of the above

Discuss

Answer: (b).No, antidebugger tricks are risky because they can sometimes generate false positives and cause the program to malfunction even though no debugger is present. Explanation:Antidebugger tricks are risky because they can sometimes generate false positives and cause the program to malfunction even though no debugger is present.

Q32.

What is the difference between code encryption and code obfuscation?

Code encryption increases the program's runtime performance, while code obfuscation decreases it.

Code encryption reduces the program's memory footprint, while code obfuscation increases it.

Code encryption makes the program more difficult to reverse engineer, while code obfuscation makes it more difficult to analyze the program's behavior.

None of the above

Discuss

Answer: (c).Code encryption makes the program more difficult to reverse engineer, while code obfuscation makes it more difficult to analyze the program's behavior. Explanation:The difference between code encryption and code obfuscation is that code encryption makes the program more difficult to reverse engineer, while code obfuscation makes it more difficult to analyze the program's behavior.

Q33.

Which of the following is not true about antidebugger tricks?

They are effective when combined with code encryption.

They are always platform-specific and depend on the specific operating system.

They can generate false positives and cause the program to malfunction even though no debugger is present.

They always result in the program growing in footprint or decreasing in runtime performance.

Discuss

Answer: (d).They always result in the program growing in footprint or decreasing in runtime performance. Explanation:While code obfuscation can result in the program growing in footprint or decreasing in runtime performance, antidebugger tricks do not always have this effect.

Q34.

Why are antidebugger tricks risky?

They can cause the program to malfunction even though no debugger is present.

They are always platform-specific and depend on the specific operating system.

They are ineffective when combined with code encryption.

They can be automatically unpacked using unpackers without running the program.

Discuss

Answer: (a).They can cause the program to malfunction even though no debugger is present. Explanation:Antidebugger tricks can sometimes generate false positives and cause the program to malfunction even though no debugger is present, making them risky.

Q35.

How can code encryption be used in conjunction with antidebugger techniques?

Code encryption makes it impossible to automatically unpack the encrypted executable.

Code encryption makes it easier to run the program inside a debugger.

Code encryption eliminates the need for antidebugger tricks.

Code encryption has no effect on antidebugger techniques.

Discuss

Answer: (a).Code encryption makes it impossible to automatically unpack the encrypted executable. Explanation:Encrypting the program forces reversers to run it inside a debugger in order to allow the program to decrypt itself, making it more difficult to reverse engineer.

Q36.

Which operating systems are antidebugger tricks reasonably effective and compatible with?

NT-based operating systems.

Unix-based operating systems.

Mac OS X operating systems.

All operating systems.

Discuss

Answer: (a).NT-based operating systems. Explanation:The antidebugging tricks discussed are compatible with NT-based operating systems.

Q37.

What is the int 3 instruction used for in debugging?

To replace the original instruction in the program

To notify the debugger that a breakpoint has been reached

To freeze the program

To execute each instruction individually and return control to the debugger

Discuss

Answer: (b).To notify the debugger that a breakpoint has been reached Explanation:The int 3 instruction is a special breakpoint interrupt that notifies the debugger that a breakpoint has been reached. Once the debugger is notified, it replaces the int 3 with the original instruction from the program and freezes the program so that the operator can inspect its state.

Q38.

What is a hardware breakpoint?

A breakpoint that the processor itself manages

A breakpoint that modifies the target program

A breakpoint that freezes the program

A breakpoint that generates an interrupt after every instruction

Discuss

Answer: (a).A breakpoint that the processor itself manages Explanation:A hardware breakpoint is a breakpoint that the processor itself manages. Hardware breakpoints don’t modify anything in the target program—the processor simply knows to break when a specific memory address is accessed.

Q39.

How is single-stepping implemented on IA-32 processors?

By replacing the original instruction with an int 3 instruction

By using the processor’s trap flag (TF) in the EFLAGS register

By generating an interrupt after every instruction that is executed

By freezing the program after each instruction

Discuss

Answer: (b).By using the processor’s trap flag (TF) in the EFLAGS register Explanation:Single-stepping is implemented on IA-32 processors using the processor’s trap flag (TF) in the EFLAGS register. When the trap flag is enabled, the processor generates an interrupt after every instruction that is executed. In this case, the interrupt is interrupt number 1, which is the single-step interrupt.

Q40.

What is the purpose of incorporating antidebugger techniques in a program?

To prevent or complicate the process of stepping through the program and placing breakpoints in it

To make it easier for the operator to inspect the program's state

To increase the program's runtime performance

None of the above

Discuss

Answer: (a).To prevent or complicate the process of stepping through the program and placing breakpoints in it Explanation:Antidebugger techniques are used to prevent or complicate the process of stepping through the program and placing breakpoints in it.

Page 4 of 15

Low Level Software 🔒

Windows Fundamentals 🔒

Reversing Tools 🔒

Auditing Program Binaries 🔒

Reversing Malware 🔒

Breaking Protections 🔒

Reversing .NET 🔒

Deciphering Code Structures 🔒

Deciphering Program Data 🔒

Welcome to the Antireversing Techniques MCQs Page

Antireversing Techniques MCQs | Page 4 of 15

Explore more Topics under Reverse Engineering

Introduction to Reverse Engineering

Beyond the Documentation

Deciphering File Formats

Piracy and Copy Protection

Decompilation

Understanding Compiled Arithmetic

Suggested Topics

Discrete Mathematics

MATLAB

Computer Architecture

Java Spring Framework

Java Programming

Systems Programming

PHP

Software Architecture and Design

C# programming