adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why is designing for continuously available interaction challenging?

a.

Users are not interested in continuous interaction.

b.

Activities rarely have a clear beginning or end, requiring greater flexibility.

c.

Interruptions are not expected during activities.

d.

Multiple activities cannot operate concurrently.

Answer: (b).Activities rarely have a clear beginning or end, requiring greater flexibility. Explanation:Designing for continuously available interaction is challenging because activities rarely have a clear beginning or end, which requires greater flexibility in the design to accommodate this aspect.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why is designing for continuously available interaction challenging?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. How does the concept of "associative models of information" relate to designing for continuous interaction?

Q. What does the term "orchestrating daily routines" refer to in the context of everyday computing?

Q. What is the main shift in focus that occurs in ubiquitous computing (ubicomp) compared to traditional computing?

Q. How does the concept of "knowledge in the world" differ from "knowledge in the head" in HCI design?

Q. Which theory emphasizes the transformational properties of artifacts and the fluid execution of actions and operations in ubicomp?

Q. How does activity theory differ from the Model Human Processor theory?

Q. What does "knowledge in the head" refer to in the context of HCI design?

Q. What is a key characteristic of the theories of situated action and distributed cognition?

Q. How does the theory of situated action differ from the Model Human Processor (MHP) theory?

Q. According to distributed cognition, how is knowledge distributed within a system?

Q. How does the emphasis on knowledge in the world differ between situated action and distributed cognition?

Q. What is the main goal of using ethnography in the context of ubicomp research?

Q. How does the use of cultural probes differ from ethnography in ubicomp research?

Q. Why has the development of assessment and evaluation techniques for ubicomp been relatively slow?

Q. How does the shift away from the desktop in ubicomp impact evaluation methods?

Q. Why is it challenging to obtain deeper empirical evaluation results for ubicomp applications?

Q. How are researchers addressing the challenge of obtaining real-world evaluation results for ubicomp systems?

Q. What does the term "virtual reality" refer to?

Q. In virtual reality, what is the purpose of a headset?

Q. What is the primary focus of virtual reality?