adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why is the use of copy/cut to the clipboard considered one of the main triggers in sensor-based systems?

a.

It provides a cross-application standard.

b.

It simplifies data fusion processes.

c.

It enhances sensor accuracy.

d.

It supports architectural openness.

Answer: (a).It provides a cross-application standard. Explanation:Copy/cut to the clipboard is considered a main trigger in sensor-based systems because it provides a cross-application standard that can facilitate interactions.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why is the use of copy/cut to the clipboard considered one of the main triggers in sensor-based systems?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the significance of architectural openness in sensor-based systems for incidental interaction?

Q. What is the purpose of inferring context from available sensor data in low intention interactions?

Q. What is an essential step in designing for low attention and incidental interaction?

Q. What is a key distinction between traditional interfaces and sensor-based systems?

Q. In sensor-based systems, what is a common challenge when inferring user intentions?

Q. What is a fundamental question posed by incidental interaction in terms of task analysis?

Q. How do users perceive odd or magical actions in a computer system compared to the real world?

Q. What is a key reason for developing GUI interface styles?

Q. How does computation affect the properties of physical objects?

Q. What properties of natural physical things do humans inherently understand?

Q. How do incidental interactions differ from expected interactions in terms of user awareness?

Q. What is the primary focus of traditional cognitive modeling?

Q. What does incidental interaction challenge in terms of interaction modeling?

Q. In traditional cognitive modeling, how is the intentional cycle typically portrayed?

Q. What fundamental assumption about interaction is challenged by incidental interaction?

Q. What is the term for the change from incidental to expected interaction when users become aware of incidental interactions?

Q. What may cause users to move through the continuum of intentionality toward more purposeful interaction?

Q. What challenge does incidental interaction pose to traditional interaction design?

Q. How do low attention and natural input paradigms differ from traditional interfaces?

Q. What is an example of incidental interaction?