adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What is the significance of architectural openness in sensor-based systems for incidental interaction?

a.

It enhances the efficiency of individual applications.

b.

It promotes standardized coding practices.

c.

It enables cross-application communication.

d.

It ensures strict privacy protection.

Answer: (c).It enables cross-application communication. Explanation:Architectural openness is important in sensor-based systems for incidental interaction as it allows components to exchange information between applications and enable cross-application communication.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What is the significance of architectural openness in sensor-based systems for incidental interaction?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the purpose of inferring context from available sensor data in low intention interactions?

Q. What is an essential step in designing for low attention and incidental interaction?

Q. What is a key distinction between traditional interfaces and sensor-based systems?

Q. In sensor-based systems, what is a common challenge when inferring user intentions?

Q. What is a fundamental question posed by incidental interaction in terms of task analysis?

Q. How do users perceive odd or magical actions in a computer system compared to the real world?

Q. What is a key reason for developing GUI interface styles?

Q. How does computation affect the properties of physical objects?

Q. What properties of natural physical things do humans inherently understand?

Q. How do incidental interactions differ from expected interactions in terms of user awareness?

Q. What is the primary focus of traditional cognitive modeling?

Q. What does incidental interaction challenge in terms of interaction modeling?

Q. In traditional cognitive modeling, how is the intentional cycle typically portrayed?

Q. What fundamental assumption about interaction is challenged by incidental interaction?

Q. What is the term for the change from incidental to expected interaction when users become aware of incidental interactions?

Q. What may cause users to move through the continuum of intentionality toward more purposeful interaction?

Q. What challenge does incidental interaction pose to traditional interaction design?

Q. How do low attention and natural input paradigms differ from traditional interfaces?

Q. What is an example of incidental interaction?

Q. Which term is used to describe interfaces that involve less explicit interactions and emphasize non-intrusive output?