adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What might be a possible reason for not using CCT to represent concurrent plans?

a.

CCT does not support concurrent planning.

b.

Concurrent plans are not useful for interface design.

c.

The notation used in CCT is not suitable for concurrency.

d.

CCT is mainly focused on low-level, proceduralized goals.

Answer: (d).CCT is mainly focused on low-level, proceduralized goals. Explanation:CCT, like GOMS, is primarily focused on low-level, proceduralized goals, which might be why it's not normally used to represent concurrent plans.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What might be a possible reason for not using CCT to represent concurrent plans?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the main benefit of complementing the cognitive user description with a system description in CCT?

Q. What is a potential limitation of the "production rules" model used in CCT?

Q. What risk is associated with forming a goal hierarchy?

Q. In what context can a "natural hierarchy" be particularly useful?

Q. What is the "closure problem" in the context of early automated teller machines (ATMs)?

Q. How did banks address the "closure problem" with early ATMs?

Q. What is a general rule that can be applied to goal hierarchies to avoid the "closure problem"?

Q. What is the main purpose of using Backus–Naur Form (BNF) rules in the context of dialog modeling?

Q. How does the BNF description for an interface differ from a programming language?

Q. In the BNF rule "choose-one ::= position-mouse + CLICK-MOUSE," what does the "+" operator represent?

Q. How is the complexity of an interface measured using BNF?

Q. What is the main advantage of using Task–action grammar (TAG) over BNF in dialog modeling?

Q. How does Task–action grammar (TAG) handle consistency in commands?

Q. In the context of TAG, what does the term "known-item" refer to?

Q. What is "congruence" in the context of dialog modeling?

Q. How does Task–action grammar (TAG) address the issue of user language and world knowledge?

Q. What are the main challenges posed by display-based systems for traditional goal hierarchical and grammar-based techniques?

Q. What is the implicit assumption about users' knowledge in traditional techniques?

Q. In the context of grammar-based techniques, what is the challenge associated with the lowest-level lexical structure?

Q. How can the problem of recognizing the meaning of clicking at a specific point on the screen be partially resolved?