adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What is the distinction between validation and verification?

a.

Validation involves subjective evaluation, while verification is based on objective proofs.

b.

Validation focuses on internal consistency, while verification ensures the customer's requirements are satisfied.

c.

Validation is carried out within a single life-cycle activity, while verification occurs between two adjacent activities.

d.

Validation is concerned with the correctness of algorithms, while verification checks for completeness.

Answer: (a).Validation involves subjective evaluation, while verification is based on objective proofs. Explanation:The distinction between validation and verification is that validation involves subjective evaluation and focuses on demonstrating that the customer's requirements are satisfied. On the other hand, verification is based on objective proofs and focuses on internal consistency and correctness within the design.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What is the distinction between validation and verification?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What activities are involved in the software life cycle?

Q. What is the main purpose of architectural design in the software life cycle?

Q. Which activity in the software life cycle involves refining the component description provided by architectural design?

Q. What is the primary purpose of validation in the software life cycle?

Q. Which phase of the software life cycle involves correcting errors in the system after release and revising the system to satisfy new requirements?

Q. What is the main difference between a formal proof and a rigorous proof?

Q. What is the "formality gap" referred to in the context of validation proofs?

Q. What may dictate the extent of proofs carried out in a design project?

Q. Which type of proof is more commonly used for verification in software development?

Q. What does the "formality gap" imply for the validation of interactive systems?

Q. How can the confidence in subjective proof be increased during validation?

Q. What is the importance of design notations in narrowing the formality gap for validation?

Q. In the context of software development, why are managerial issues of design important?

Q. What is the distinction between the technical perspective and the managerial perspective of the software life cycle?

Q. What does signing off on a requirements specification indicate?

Q. Why is it worth the effort to understand and improve the interactive system design process?

Q. Why is it challenging to determine all the requirements for an interactive system from the start?

Q. How does the formality gap impact the validation of interactive systems?

Q. How does the life cycle of interactive systems differ from traditional software life cycles?

Q. What role do experts play in the validation of interactive systems?