adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What does the "formality gap" imply for the validation of interactive systems?

a.

The validation process will rely entirely on formal mathematical proofs.

b.

The validation process will be entirely subjective and lack objective proof.

c.

The validation process will require experts with design expertise.

d.

The validation process will focus on architectural design.

Answer: (b).The validation process will be entirely subjective and lack objective proof. Explanation:The "formality gap" implies that the validation process for interactive systems will be subjective to some extent and may lack objective proof. As the origin of customer requirements lies in the inherent ambiguity of the real world, formal proofs are not feasible, and validation will involve subjective means.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What does the "formality gap" imply for the validation of interactive systems?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. How can the confidence in subjective proof be increased during validation?

Q. What is the importance of design notations in narrowing the formality gap for validation?

Q. In the context of software development, why are managerial issues of design important?

Q. What is the distinction between the technical perspective and the managerial perspective of the software life cycle?

Q. What does signing off on a requirements specification indicate?

Q. Why is it worth the effort to understand and improve the interactive system design process?

Q. Why is it challenging to determine all the requirements for an interactive system from the start?

Q. How does the formality gap impact the validation of interactive systems?

Q. How does the life cycle of interactive systems differ from traditional software life cycles?

Q. What role do experts play in the validation of interactive systems?

Q. What is a key challenge in managing the development of interactive systems?

Q. What is the primary challenge in predicting human behavior for designing interactive systems?

Q. Why are some models of human users not useful at early and abstract stages of design?

Q. What is the importance of conducting experiments for testing usability properties of designs?

Q. What is the significance of making experimental systems resemble the final product?

Q. What is the challenge in the principled approach to interactive system design?

Q. What is the "chicken-and-egg puzzle" in interactive system design?

Q. Which approach to interactive system design relies on early understanding of user tasks?

Q. What was the main limitation of traditional software life cycles for interactive system design?

Q. What is one limitation of the traditional software life cycle in supporting user tasks?