adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What is the key difference between deductive and inductive reasoning?

a.

Deductive reasoning relies on positive evidence, while inductive reasoning relies on negative evidence.

b.

Deductive reasoning draws conclusions based on generalizations, while inductive reasoning infers information about unseen cases.

c.

Deductive reasoning always leads to true conclusions, while inductive reasoning is unreliable.

d.

Deductive reasoning derives conclusions that conflict with our knowledge of the world, while inductive reasoning does not.

Answer: (b).Deductive reasoning draws conclusions based on generalizations, while inductive reasoning infers information about unseen cases. Explanation:The key difference between deductive and inductive reasoning is that deductive reasoning draws conclusions based on generalizations and logical necessity, while inductive reasoning infers information about unseen cases based on observed cases. Deductive reasoning starts with specific premises and reaches a specific conclusion, while inductive reasoning involves generalizing from observed cases to make probabilistic conclusions.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What is the key difference between deductive and inductive reasoning?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is abduction in reasoning?

Q. What distinguishes problem solving from reasoning?

Q. What did the Gestalt psychologists propose about problem solving?

Q. According to problem space theory, what does the problem space consist of?

Q. What is means-ends analysis in problem solving?

Q. What is a limitation of searching the problem space according to Newell and Simon's model?

Q. In which type of problems is Newell and Simon's General Problem Solver model often applied?

Q. What is the function of analogical mapping in problem-solving?

Q. Based on the problem given by Gick and Holyoak, what is the effective way to destroy a malignant tumor using high-intensity rays?

Q. In the context of problem-solving, what does the Gestalt view of productive restructuring and insight suggest?

Q. What is the main difference between novice and expert behavior in given domains?

Q. When are people more likely to identify the analogy in a problem-solving situation?

Q. How does expert behavior typically differ from novice behavior in given domains?

Q. What is the solution to the problem of destroying a malignant tumor using high-intensity rays, as given by Gick and Holyoak?

Q. What does analogical mapping involve in problem-solving?

Q. Which of the following best describes why chess is a suitable domain for the study of problem-solving?

Q. What differentiates skilled chess players from less experienced ones according to the studies of DeGroot, Chase, and Simon?

Q. How do expert players remember chess board configurations?

Q. How do experts group problems differently from novices?

Q. Which mechanism does the ACT model suggest moves a learner from the first level of skill to the second level?