adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Which knowledge representation language is considered more expressive for semantic interoperability than RDF?

a.

OWL DL

b.

XML

c.

SQL

d.

JSON

Posted under Big Data Computing

Answer: (a).OWL DL Explanation:OWL DL is considered more expressive for semantic interoperability compared to RDF.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Which knowledge representation language is considered more expressive for semantic interoperability than RDF?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What does RDF stand for in the context of knowledge representation?

Q. What is the relationship between data interoperability and process interoperability?

Q. What is the primary challenge addressed when achieving semantic interoperability of data from heterogeneous sources in the context of Big Data?

Q. How can the data heterogeneity issue of Big Data be addressed?

Q. What is one possible approach to solving the semantic data interoperability problem of Big Data?

Q. How are ontologies used to address the semantic data interoperability problem in Big Data?

Q. What is the advantage of semantic enrichment of data in the context of Big Data?

Q. What standards are used for data transfer in the X-Road platform?

Q. What is the role of adapter servers in the X-Road platform?

Q. What is the primary role of the X-Road middleware platform in Estonian e-government?

Q. How many e-government data services are registered and run on X-road?

Q. How many organizations have connected their data sources via X-road middleware?

Q. What is the estimated number of requests handled by X-road in 2011, as per the statistics provided by the Administration System for the State Information System?

Q. How does the X-road approach achieve data interoperability between disparate data sources?

Q. How does the X-road approach address semantic data interoperability problems?

Q. What strategic document was issued by the Estonian Ministry of Economic Affairs in 2005 to address semantic interoperability in state information technology?

Q. What is the main focus of the semantic interoperability architecture for Estonian state information systems proposed by Haav et al. (2009)?

Q. Which ontology description language was chosen for the architecture's domain ontologies?

Q. How are data services of state information systems currently described in the architecture?

Q. What is the role of the Administration System for the State Information System (RIHA) in the architecture?