adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What is the primary distinction between abstract temporal databases and concrete temporal databases?

a.

Abstract temporal databases rely on finite representations, while concrete temporal databases rely on infinite structures.

b.

Abstract temporal databases represent time using intervals, while concrete temporal databases use timestamps.

c.

Abstract temporal databases capture real-world time, while concrete temporal databases capture database storage time.

d.

Abstract temporal databases store data in the form of tables, while concrete temporal databases use compact representations.

Posted under Big Data Computing

Answer: (c).Abstract temporal databases capture real-world time, while concrete temporal databases capture database storage time. Explanation:The primary distinction between abstract temporal databases and concrete temporal databases is that abstract temporal databases capture real-world time (valid time), while concrete temporal databases capture the time when data is stored in the database (transaction time).

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What is the primary distinction between abstract temporal databases and concrete temporal databases?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the difference between valid time and transaction time in the context of temporal databases?

Q. What is a bitemporal database?

Q. In the temporal SQL query "SELECT ID, Location, Value FROM Sensor WHERE Start >= 20 and End <= 27," what is the expected result with respect to abstract temporal databases?

Q. What does the SQL query "SELECT ID, Value, Start, End FROM Sensor WHERE Start <= 23 and End >= 27" retrieve?

Q. In the context of stream-based query answering, what is the key idea?

Q. What is the purpose of sliding time windows in stream-based query answering?

Q. What are temporal aggregation operators used for in stream-based query languages?

Q. What are some extensions to the RDF query language SPARQL that have been proposed for stream-based access scenarios?

Q. In the context of stream-based query answering, what does C-SPARQL rely on for dealing with entailments for RDFS or OWL 2 RL?

Q. What is SNEEQL?

Q. What is EP-SPARQL tailored for?

Q. What is CQELS known for in the context of stream-based query implementations?

Q. How does T-SPARQL apply techniques from temporal databases to RDF querying?

Q. What combination of querying approaches is considered useful in applications?

Q. What was a design goal in early work on deductive event recognition?

Q. Why are brute-force approaches for query answering with respect to ontologies not suitable for large real-world ontologies?

Q. What is one promising idea for scalable stream-based answering of continuous queries?

Q. What was the traditional assumption made by OBDA approaches regarding query execution?

Q. Why is the assumption of centralized query execution not usually applicable in the real world for OBDA?

Q. What is FedX in context of query execution ?