adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why are scripts typically prevented from allowing SETUID to work in Linux?

a.

Scripts are considered dangerous

b.

Scripts lack the shebang (#!)

c.

SETUID doesn't enhance the power of scripts

d.

Scripts are not supported in Linux

Answer: (a).Scripts are considered dangerous Explanation:Scripts are typically prevented from allowing SETUID to work in Linux because they are considered dangerous, and the shebang at the start of a script can be abused by attackers to gain greater access.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why are scripts typically prevented from allowing SETUID to work in Linux?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Which of the following Linux executables can be used for privilege escalation if SUID permission is set?

Q. What is the significance of the shebang (#!) in a script?

Q. In the context of privilege escalation on Linux, what does the s flag set for executables indicate?

Q. What can penetration testers potentially exploit when discovering executables with SUID or GUID bits on a Linux system?

Q. In Linux, what must penetration testers be aware of when working with different distributions and versions?

Q. How does the sudo command function in Linux, and where are the associated settings typically found?

Q. In Linux, if a sudo-capable user account can run a program as root, what potential privilege escalation opportunity does this present?

Q. What type of access may a seemingly low-privileged account with permission to run Python or Perl as root have on a Linux system?

Q. How can seemingly innocent permissions to run files lead to privilege escalation using sudo?

Q. What limitations are commonly imposed by restricted shells in Linux?

Q. How can penetration testers break out of restricted shells in Linux?

Q. When confronted with a restricted shell, what should penetration testers check to identify potential avenues for privilege escalation?

Q. What utility may be used by penetration testers to escape restricted shells in Linux?

Q. In the context of privilege escalation on Linux, what should penetration testers check regarding sudo?

Q. When dealing with a restricted shell, what elements should penetration testers check for potential exploitation?

Q. Why are Linux kernel exploits considered a favorite tool for penetration testers?

Q. How does the CVE list classify Linux kernel exploits?

Q. Which type of Linux kernel exploits is most likely to be useful to penetration testers?

Q. What is a common opportunity for penetration testers regarding Linux kernel patches?

Q. How can penetration testers quickly check a Linux system for potential kernel issues?