adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Which built-in instructions are relatively slow and have a high latency in computers?

a.

ADD and SUB

b.

MUL and IMUL

c.

DIV and IDIV

d.

LEA and ADD

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (c).DIV and IDIV Explanation:The built-in instructions for division, DIV and IDIV, are relatively slow and have a latency of over 50 clock cycles.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Which built-in instructions are relatively slow and have a high latency in computers?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Why is using DIV usually bad for performance but good for reversers?

Q. What happens when a compiler has constant divisors?

Q. What is reciprocal multiplication?

Q. Why is multiplication preferred over division in computers?

Q. How can fixed-point arithmetic be used to represent fractions and real numbers?

Q. How is the reciprocal of a divisor used in reciprocal multiplication?

Q. What is the benefit of using reciprocal multiplication over division in computers?

Q. What is fixed-point arithmetic?

Q. How does fixed-point arithmetic represent fractional values in integers?

Q. What is the result of multiplying a 32-bit dividend by an integer reciprocal?

Q. How do compilers achieve greater accuracy with reciprocals when working with large dividends?

Q. What is the purpose of the imaginary dot in an integer when representing an approximation of a real number?

Q. How is the fractional value represented in a fixed-point representation of a real number?

Q. Why is the last digit in each reciprocal incremented by one?

Q. When do compilers use reciprocal in multiplication instructions?

Q. What is modulo?

Q. What is the most common and intuitive method for calculating the modulo of a signed 32-bit integer?

Q. Why is the approach of using IDIV not the fastest in terms of runtime performance?

Q. What do some compilers use in order to determine the modulo?

Q. Why do modern 32-bit software use larger-than-32-bit integer data types?