adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What is the purpose of creating software that is immune to reversing?

a.

To make it difficult for hackers to access sensitive information

b.

To prevent piracy and protect intellectual property

c.

To increase the performance and reliability of the software

d.

To create a competitive advantage over other software developers

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (b).To prevent piracy and protect intellectual property Explanation:Creating software that is immune to reversing is beneficial for preventing piracy and protecting intellectual property.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What is the purpose of creating software that is immune to reversing?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Is it possible to entirely prevent reversing?

Q. What factors affect the likelihood of a reverser succeeding?

Q. What is the cost associated with antireversing techniques?

Q. Why is antireversing important?

Q. Are all programs worth reversing?

Q. Why do copy protection technologies require antireversing measures?

Q. What software development platforms necessitate antireversing measures?

Q. What is the first step in hindering reversers in a compiled program?

Q. What is obfuscation?

Q. Which programming languages or platforms often contain large amounts of internal symbolic information?

Q. What is the most fundamental feature of pretty much every bytecode obfuscator?

Q. Why should software developers consider introducing antireversing measures into their programs?

Q. What is the main advantage of eliminating symbolic information from the program executable?

Q. What is the purpose of embedding antidebugger code in a program?

Q. What is information elimination?

Q. Which languages typically do not include symbolic information in release builds?

Q. What is one area where even compiler-based programs can contain symbolic information?

Q. Why might it be worthwhile to export all functions by ordinals rather than by names?

Q. Why is the issue of symbolic information different with most bytecode-based languages?

Q. What is the typical strategy for eliminating internal names in bytecode-based programs?