adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Which programming languages or platforms often contain large amounts of internal symbolic information?

a.

Java and .NET

b.

Python and Ruby

c.

C++ and C#

d.

None of the above

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (a).Java and .NET Explanation:Bytecode-based programs, such as those in Java and .NET, often contain large amounts of internal symbolic information such as class names, class member names, and the names of instantiated global objects.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Which programming languages or platforms often contain large amounts of internal symbolic information?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the most fundamental feature of pretty much every bytecode obfuscator?

Q. Why should software developers consider introducing antireversing measures into their programs?

Q. What is the main advantage of eliminating symbolic information from the program executable?

Q. What is the purpose of embedding antidebugger code in a program?

Q. What is information elimination?

Q. Which languages typically do not include symbolic information in release builds?

Q. What is one area where even compiler-based programs can contain symbolic information?

Q. Why might it be worthwhile to export all functions by ordinals rather than by names?

Q. Why is the issue of symbolic information different with most bytecode-based languages?

Q. What is the typical strategy for eliminating internal names in bytecode-based programs?

Q. What is code encryption?

Q. What is required for the decryption of an encrypted program?

Q. Why must a decrypted copy of the program reside in memory during runtime?

Q. Can encrypted programs be programmatically decrypted?

Q. How can the automatic unpacking of executables be prevented?

Q. Why is it sometimes beneficial to incorporate special code in a program that prevents or complicates the process of stepping through the program and placing breakpoints in it?

Q. When is combining antidebugger techniques with code encryption particularly effective?

Q. Can it be possible to automatically unpack encrypted executables?

Q. Are antidebugger tricks generally platform-specific?

Q. Are antidebugger tricks without risks?