Welcome to the Antireversing Techniques MCQs Page

Dive deep into the fascinating world of Antireversing Techniques with our comprehensive set of Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs). This page is dedicated to exploring the fundamental concepts and intricacies of Antireversing Techniques, a crucial aspect of Reverse Engineering. In this section, you will encounter a diverse range of MCQs that cover various aspects of Antireversing Techniques, from the basic principles to advanced topics. Each question is thoughtfully crafted to challenge your knowledge and deepen your understanding of this critical subcategory within Reverse Engineering.

Check out the MCQs below to embark on an enriching journey through Antireversing Techniques. Test your knowledge, expand your horizons, and solidify your grasp on this vital area of Reverse Engineering.

Note: Each MCQ comes with multiple answer choices. Select the most appropriate option and test your understanding of Antireversing Techniques. You can click on an option to test your knowledge before viewing the solution for a MCQ. Happy learning!

Antireversing Techniques MCQs | Page 11 of 15

Explore more Topics under Reverse Engineering

01

Introduction to Reverse Engineering

02

Low Level Software 🔒

03

Windows Fundamentals 🔒

04

Reversing Tools 🔒

05

Beyond the Documentation

06

Deciphering File Formats

07

Auditing Program Binaries 🔒

08

Reversing Malware 🔒

09

Piracy and Copy Protection

10

Breaking Protections 🔒

11

Reversing .NET 🔒

12

Decompilation

13

Deciphering Code Structures 🔒

14

Understanding Compiled Arithmetic

15

Deciphering Program Data 🔒

Q101.

How do computation transformations reduce the readability of code?

By removing control flow information from the program

By adding new control flow statements that complicate the program

Both a and b

None of the above

Discuss

Answer: (c).Both a and b Explanation:Computation transformations reduce the readability of code by modifying the program’s original control flow structure in ways that make for a functionally equivalent program that is far more difficult to translate back into a high-level language. This can be done either by removing control flow information from the program or by adding new control flow statements that complicate the program.

Q102.

What are aggregation transformations?

Transformations that alter the order and flow of a program

Transformations that are aimed at reducing the readability of the code

Transformations that destroy the high-level structure of the program

None of the above

Discuss

Answer: (c).Transformations that destroy the high-level structure of the program Explanation:Aggregation transformations destroy the high-level structure of the program by breaking the high-level abstractions created by the programmer while the program was being written. The basic idea is to break such abstractions so that the high-level organization of the code becomes senseless.

Q103.

What are ordering transformations?

Transformations that alter the order and flow of a program

Transformations that are aimed at reducing the readability of the code

Transformations that destroy the high-level structure of the program

None of the above

Discuss

Answer: (a).Transformations that alter the order and flow of a program Explanation:Ordering transformations randomize (as much as possible) the order of operations in a program so that its readability is reduced.

Q104.

In which type of programs are opaque predicates more effective?

Low-level machine-code programs

High-level bytecode programs

Both a and b

None of the above

Discuss

Answer: (a).Low-level machine-code programs Explanation:Opaque predicates are more effective when implemented in lower-level machine-code programs than in higher-level bytecode program, because they are far more difficult to detect in low-level machine code.

Q105.

What is the primary goal of most bytecode obfuscators?

To make the code easier to restore to a highly detailed source code

To make the code easier to decompile

To confuse decompilers so that the code cannot be easily restored to a highly detailed source code

To add goto statements into the bytecode

Discuss

Answer: (c).To confuse decompilers so that the code cannot be easily restored to a highly detailed source code Explanation:One of the primary design goals of most bytecode obfuscators is to confuse decompilers, so that the code cannot be easily restored to a highly detailed source code.

Q106.

What is one trick that bytecode obfuscators use to confuse decompilers?

Modifying the program binary to include statements that cannot be translated back to the high-level language

Removing all unnecessary code from the program binary

Adding comments to the program binary that are difficult to decipher

None of the above

Discuss

Answer: (a).Modifying the program binary to include statements that cannot be translated back to the high-level language Explanation:One trick that bytecode obfuscators use to confuse decompilers is to modify the program binary so that the bytecode contains statements that cannot be translated back into the original high-level language.

Q107.

Why can adding goto statements into the bytecode break a program's flow graph?

Because goto statements are not part of the high-level language

Because goto statements are difficult to decompile

Because goto statements are easy to decompile

None of the above

Discuss

Answer: (a).Because goto statements are not part of the high-level language Explanation:In the Java programming language, the high-level language does not have the goto statement, but the Java bytecode does. Therefore, adding goto statements into the bytecode can break the program's flow graph, because it contains instructions that cannot be translated back to Java.

Q108.

Why is decompilation in native processor languages such as IA-32 machine code complex and fragile?

Because the code is too simple

Because the code is too difficult to read

Because any kind of obfuscation transformation could easily cause the decompilation to fail or produce meaningless code

None of the above

Discuss

Answer: (c).Because any kind of obfuscation transformation could easily cause the decompilation to fail or produce meaningless code Explanation:Decompilation in native processor languages such as IA-32 machine code is complex and fragile because any kind of obfuscation transformation could easily cause the decompilation to fail or produce meaningless code.

Q109.

What is a table interpretation layout obfuscation approach?

Breaking code into multiple short chunks and having it loop through a conditional code sequence

Encoding code into a table format for easier readability

Converting code into a machine language

None of the above

Discuss

Answer: (a).Breaking code into multiple short chunks and having it loop through a conditional code sequence Explanation:The table interpretation layout is an obfuscation approach that involves breaking down a code sequence into multiple short chunks and having it loop through a conditional code sequence.

Q110.

What is the purpose of using a table interpretation layout for obfuscation?

To make the code harder to read for deobfuscators and human reversers

To make the code more readable for developers

To make the code more efficient in terms of processing power

None of the above

Discuss

Answer: (a).To make the code harder to read for deobfuscators and human reversers Explanation:The purpose of using a table interpretation layout for obfuscation is to make the code harder to read for deobfuscators and human reversers.

Page 11 of 15

Low Level Software 🔒

Windows Fundamentals 🔒

Reversing Tools 🔒

Auditing Program Binaries 🔒

Reversing Malware 🔒

Breaking Protections 🔒

Reversing .NET 🔒

Deciphering Code Structures 🔒

Deciphering Program Data 🔒

Welcome to the Antireversing Techniques MCQs Page

Antireversing Techniques MCQs | Page 11 of 15

Explore more Topics under Reverse Engineering

Introduction to Reverse Engineering

Beyond the Documentation

Deciphering File Formats

Piracy and Copy Protection

Decompilation

Understanding Compiled Arithmetic

Suggested Topics

CSS

Embedded Systems

Discrete Mathematics

Hadoop

DBMS

HTML

Formal Languages and Automata Theory

Microprocessor

UNIX