adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why is synthesized speech often perceived as imperfect?

a.

It lacks natural prosody and intonation

b.

It is transient and cannot be reviewed

c.

It requires the use of headphones

d.

It is intrusive in the office environment

Answer: (a).It lacks natural prosody and intonation Explanation:Synthesized speech is often perceived as imperfect because it lacks the natural prosody and intonation present in natural speech, making it difficult for users to adjust to.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why is synthesized speech often perceived as imperfect?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. For which group of users has synthesized speech been particularly successful?

Q. What do screen readers do in the context of synthesized speech?

Q. In what scenario is speech synthesis most challenging as a communication tool?

Q. How can speech synthesis enhance applications where the user's visual attention is focused elsewhere?

Q. What is the benefit of using fixed pre-recorded messages in the interface?

Q. How can recordings of users' speech be useful in collaborative applications?

Q. What happens when you simply play an audio recording faster?

Q. How can digital signal processing techniques address the issue of accelerated speech?

Q. In what scenario can accelerated playback of speech recordings be beneficial?

Q. Why can non-speech sounds be assimilated more quickly than speech?

Q. What advantage does non-speech sound have in terms of auditory adaptation?

Q. How can non-speech sounds provide status information in interactive systems?

Q. What is the primary advantage of using non-speech sounds that occur naturally in the world?

Q. What is the potential benefit of using abstract generated sounds in the interface?

Q. What is the primary reason auditory icons use natural sounds?

Q. What is the main advantage of using auditory icons in interface design?

Q. In the SonicFinder interface, how are auditory icons used to represent objects and actions?

Q. What is a challenge in using auditory icons for objects and actions that lack obvious, naturally occurring sounds?

Q. How can auditory icons convey additional information beyond representing objects and actions?

Q. What are earcons in interface design?