adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What does the MVC paradigm stand for in the context of interactive system development?

a.

Model–View–Component

b.

Multilayered Virtual Context

c.

Management–View–Controller

d.

Model–View–Controller

Answer: (d).Model–View–Controller Explanation:The MVC paradigm stands for Model–View–Controller, which is a design pattern used in interactive system development.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What does the MVC paradigm stand for in the context of interactive system development?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. In the context of the MVC paradigm, what does the "model" represent?

Q. How does Smalltalk utilize the MVC paradigm for building interactive systems?

Q. What does the PAC model stand for in the context of interactive system architecture?

Q. What is the role of the "abstraction component" in the PAC model?

Q. How does the PAC model differ from the MVC model in terms of input and output?

Q. What is the primary purpose of menu networks in interactive systems?

Q. How does the use of callback procedures differ between the X toolkit and the MVC architecture?

Q. What is the primary advantage of using menu networks as an implementation technique for dialog control?

Q. What is the main advantage of using a multi-agent architecture, such as the PAC model, for interactive systems?

Q. In the context of interactive systems, what does the term "PAC" stand for in the PAC model?

Q. Which programming paradigm involves an internal control loop within the application program to handle events and interactions?

Q. What is a key benefit of using toolkits in interactive system development?

Q. In the context of UIMS, what is the role of the dialog control component?

Q. What is a limitation of using formal context-free grammar notations, such as BNF, to describe interactive system dialogs?

Q. State transition diagrams are used for expressing dialogs graphically. What challenge do they face in linking events with their corresponding presentation or application actions?

Q. What advantage do event languages have over formal grammar notations for describing interactive system dialogs?

Q. What is a characteristic of production rules in the context of event languages?

Q. Which approach is taken by declarative languages in describing the relationship between application and presentation in interactive systems?

Q. How do constraint systems contribute to describing the relationship between application and presentation?

Q. What is the primary advantage of using graphical specification techniques for dialog specification in interactive systems?