adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What is the main reason for the differences in results between studies such as (Lientz and Swanson, 1980) and Schach et al. (2003)?

a.

Differences in study methods

b.

Differences in definitions of software maintenance

c.

Differences in the systems studied

d.

A convincing argument for the differences does not exist

Answer: (d).A convincing argument for the differences does not exist Explanation:There is no convincing argument for the differences between the results of (Lientz and Swanson, 1980) and Schach et al. (2003).

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What is the main reason for the differences in results between studies such as (Lientz and Swanson, 1980) and Schach et al. (2003)?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the result of some organizations not following the IEEE definition of software maintenance?

Q. What is the first stage of the maintenance life cycle?

Q. During which stage of the maintenance life cycle is emphasis placed on correcting faults?

Q. What type of maintenance tasks are common during the decline stage?

Q. What is necessary for successful maintenance?

Q. When does the knowledge of the application usually become scant?

Q. What is the main activity of code-related tasks in maintenance?

Q. How much effort does isolation take in a single maintenance task?

Q. Which type of maintenance task takes the most effort in isolation?

Q. Which type of maintenance task takes the most effort in modification?

Q. What are some of the major causes of maintenance problems?

Q. What is the definition of software evolution according to Lehman and Belady?

Q. What is the Law of Continuing Change in software evolution?

Q. What is the Law of Increasing Complexity in software evolution?

Q. What is the ultimate result of entropy in software systems?

Q. What is the purpose of refactoring in agile methods?

Q. What is the main problem with software maintenance?

Q. What makes it difficult for maintenance programmers to understand the system from its source code?

Q. Why do maintenance programmers become part historian, part detective, and part clairvoyant?

Q. Why is it important to have a design rationale for software maintenance?