adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why is it better to have someone else read your program text?

a.

The author may overlook things because of their familiarity with the text

b.

The author may be unable to adopt a destructive attitude towards their own work

c.

The author may have a business-like attitude

d.

The author may be less capable of assessing the quality of the text

Answer: (a).The author may overlook things because of their familiarity with the text Explanation:The author of a text may be inclined to overlook things because of their familiarity with the text and that it is difficult for the author to adopt a destructive attitude towards their own work.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why is it better to have someone else read your program text?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the purpose of peer review?

Q. What is egoless programming?

Q. What is the main goal of inspections in software development?

Q. Who is responsible for the organization of inspection meetings?

Q. What is the role of the code author during the inspection meeting?

Q. What is the purpose of paraphrasing the code during an inspection?

Q. What is peer review?

Q. What is the primary goal of peer review?

Q. What is the term for the attitude necessary for successfully reading someone else’s code?

Q. What is the role of the moderator in an inspection?

Q. What is the purpose of walkthroughs and inspections in software development?

Q. How is an inspection conducted?

Q. What is the role of the moderator in an inspection session?

Q. What is the goal of an inspection?

Q. What is the result of an inspection session?

Q. How is a walkthrough conducted?

Q. What is the purpose of test data in a walkthrough?

Q. At which stages of the software life cycle can walkthroughs and inspections be applied?

Q. What is the main difference between specialized design review and regular inspections?

Q. How does the review process described by Parnas and Weiss differ from other types of review processes?