Q. The following function reverse() is supposed to reverse a singly linked list. There is one line missing at the end of the function.

/* Link list node */
struct node
{
    int data;
    struct node* next;
};
 
/* head_ref is a double pointer which points to head (or start) pointer
  of linked list */
static void reverse(struct node** head_ref)
{
    struct node* prev   = NULL;
    struct node* current = *head_ref;
    struct node* next;
    while (current != NULL)
    {
        next  = current->next; 
        current->next = prev;  
        prev = current;
        current = next;
    }
    /*ADD A STATEMENT HERE*/
}

What should be added in place of "/*ADD A STATEMENT HERE*/", so that the function correctly reverses a linked list.

View solution

Q. What is the output of following function for start pointing to first node of following linked list?
1->2->3->4->5->6

void fun(struct node* start)
{
  if(start == NULL)
    return;
  printf("%d  ", start->data);
  
  if(start->next != NULL )
    fun(start->next->next);
  printf("%d  ", start->data);
}

View solution

Q. The following C function takes a simply-linked list as input argument. It modifies the list by moving the last element to the front of the list and returns the modified list. Some part of the code is left blank. Choose the correct alternative to replace the blank line.
typedef struct node
{
  int value;
  struct node *next;
}Node;
  
Node *move_to_front(Node *head)
{
  Node *p, *q;
  if ((head == NULL: || (head->next == NULL))
    return head;
  q = NULL; p = head;
  while (p-> next !=NULL)
  {
    q = p;
    p = p->next;
  }
  _______________________________
  return head;
}

View solution

Q. The following C function takes a single-linked list of integers as a parameter and rearranges the elements of the list. The function is called with the list containing the integers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 in the given order. What will be the contents of the list after the function completes execution?

struct node
{
  int value;
  struct node *next;
};
void rearrange(struct node *list)
{
  struct node *p, * q;
  int temp;
  if ((!list) || !list->next)
      return;
  p = list;
  q = list->next;
  while(q)
  {
     temp = p->value;
     p->value = q->value;
     q->value = temp;
     p = q->next;
     q = p?p->next:0;
  }
}

View solution

Q. In the worst case, the number of comparisons needed to search a singly linked list of length n for a given element is

View solution

Q. Suppose each set is represented as a linked list with elements in arbitrary order. Which of the operations among union, intersection, membership, cardinality will be the slowest?

View solution

Q. Consider the function f defined below.

struct item
{
int data;
struct item * next;
};

int f(struct item *p)
{
return (
(p == NULL) ||
(p->next == NULL) ||
(( P->data <= p->next->data) && f(p->next))
);
}

For a given linked list p, the function f returns 1 if and only if

View solution

Q. What are the time complexities of finding 8th element from beginning and 8th element from end in a singly linked list? Let n be the number of nodes in linked list, you may assume that n > 8.

View solution

Q. Is it possible to create a doubly linked list using only one pointer with every node.

View solution

Q. Given pointer to a node X in a singly linked list. Only one pointer is given, pointer to head node is not given, can we delete the node X from given linked list?

View solution

Q. You are given pointers to first and last nodes of a singly linked list, which of the following operations are dependent on the length of the linked list?

View solution

Q. Consider the following function to traverse a linked list.

void traverse(struct Node *head)
{
while (head->next != NULL)
{
printf("%d ", head->data);
head = head->next;
}
}

Which of the following is FALSE about above function?

View solution

Q. Let P be a singly linked list. Let Q be the pointer to an intermediate node x in the list. What is the worst-case time complexity of the best known algorithm to delete the node x from the list?

View solution

Q. N items are stored in a sorted doubly linked list. For a delete operation, a pointer is provided to the record to be deleted. For a decrease-key operation, a pointer is provided to the record on which the operation is to be performed. An algorithm performs the following operations on the list in this order: Θ(N) delete, O(log N) insert, O(log N) find, and Θ(N) decrease-key What is the time complexity of all these operations put together

View solution

Q. Following is C like pseudo code of a function that takes a number as an argument, and uses a stack S to do processing.

void fun(int n)
{
Stack S; // Say it creates an empty stack S
while (n > 0)
{
// This line pushes the value of n%2 to stack S
push(&S, n%2);

n = n/2;
}

// Run while Stack S is not empty
while (!isEmpty(&S))
printf("%d ", pop(&S)); // pop an element from S and print it
}

What does the above function do in general?

View solution

Q. Which one of the following is an application of Stack Data Structure?

View solution

Q. Which of the following is true about linked list implementation of stack?

View solution

Q. Consider the following pseudo code that uses a stack

declare a stack of characters
while ( there are more characters in the word to read )
{
   read a character
   push the character on the stack
}
while ( the stack is not empty )
{
   pop a character off the stack
   write the character to the screen
}

What is output for input "computersciencebits"?

View solution

Q. Following is an incorrect pseudocode for the algorithm which is supposed to determine whether a sequence of parentheses is balanced:

declare a character stack
while ( more input is available)
{
read a character
if ( the character is a '(' )
push it on the stack
else if ( the character is a ')' and the stack is not empty )
pop a character off the stack
else
print "unbalanced" and exit
}
print "balanced"

Which of these unbalanced sequences does the above code think is balanced?

View solution

Q. The following postfix expression with single digit operands is evaluated using a stack:
8 2 3 ^ / 2 3 * + 5 1 * -

Note that ^ is the exponentiation operator. The top two elements of the stack after the first * is evaluated are:

View solution