adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Transfer rate is negligible as compared to

a.

Seek time

b.

Latency

c.

Access time

d.

Both a and b

Answer: (d).Both a and b

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Transfer rate is negligible as compared to

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Interval between a computer making a request for transfer of data from disk to primary storage, till its completion is known to be

Q. Magnetic disks are considered less efficient than magnetic tapes for application type known to be

Q. Cost per bit of storage for magnetic disks is low, because of

Q. Magnetic disks are suitable for

Q. To maintain security of information is difficult that is stored on

Q. A magnetic tape can be used as a shared device because of its property known to be

Q. Magnetic disks are less vulnerable to

Q. Disk crash or failure of a drive results in loss of entire store data, in magnetic disk named

Q. Magnetic disk's data transfer rate is

Q. Storage capacity of magnetic disks are said to be virtually unlimited, except the

Q. Disk used as a backup device for offline storage of data is named to be

Q. Magnetic disks are most suitable then the

Q. Magnetic disks can be used by multiple users simultaneously because of

Q. For applications based on random data processing, best suitable device to use is known to be

Q. A magnetic disk's surface is divided into invisible concentric circles known to be

Q. For online secondary storage, most popular device used is named to be

Q. Binary coding scheme used in recording data in magnetic disk is known to be

Q. A track of a magnetic tape comprises of

Q. Data on magnetic disk is recorded in form of

Q. Each track of a magnetic disk is divided into