adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Disadvantage of ” Compile and GO ” loading scheme is that

a.

Memory is wasted because the case occupied by the assembler is unavailable to the object program

b.

Necessary to translate the users program

c.

It is very difficult to handle multiple segments, even when the source programs are in different languages and to produce orderly modular programs

d.

All of the mentioned

Posted under Compiler Design

Answer: (d).All of the mentioned

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Disadvantage of ” Compile and GO ” loading scheme is that

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. A relocatable program form is one which

Q. Which of the following module does not incorporate initialization of values changed by the module?

Q. Dynamic linking can cause security concerns because

Q. S -> C C
C -> eC | d

The grammar is

Q. S -> id: = E ”
newtemp ();

gen(t . place . place;); .place t} ”

.place .place;}

For the statement ‘X: = Y + Z ’,

the 3-address code sequence generated by this definition is

Q. If the programming language uses static scoping and call by need parameter passing mechanism, the values printed by the above program are

Q. If dynamic scoping is used and call by name mechanism is used, the values printed will be

Q. P x =new Q();

Q y =new Q();

P z =new Q();

x. f (1);((P) y). f (1);

z.f(1);

The output is

Q. Which of the following is NOT an advantage of using shared, dynamically linked libraries as compared to statically linked libraries?

Q. Which grammar violate rules of an operator grammar?
(i) P-> QR

(ii) P -> Q s R

(iii) P -> ε

(iv) P ->Q t

Q. Consider the grammar rule
E -> E1 − E2 for arithmetic expressions.

If E1 and E2 do not have any common sub expression, in order to get the shortest possible code

Q. The grammar
A ->AA |( A)| ε
is not suitable for predictive-parsing because the grammar is

Q. Consider the grammar
E ->E + n | E # n | n

For a sentence n + n, form of the reduction are

Q. S -> (S)| a
Let the number of states in SLR(1), LR(1) and LALR(1) parsers for the grammar n1 n2 and n3 respectively.

Q. Consider line 3:

Int main()

{ int 1,N;

Fro (I,1 N,1);

}

Identify the compiler’s response about this line while creating the object-module

Q. Which one of the following is true about the action of yacc for the given grammar?

Q. What precedence and associativity properties does the generated parser realize?

Q. Consider the following grammar.
S > S * E

S > E

E > F + E

E > F

F > id

Consider the following LR(0) items corresponding to the grammar above

(i) S -> S * .E

(ii) E -> F . + E

(iii) E -> F + .E

Given the items above, which two of them will appear in the same set in the canonical sets-of-items for the grammar?

Q. Consider the following grammar
S > FR

R > * S | ε

F > id

In the predictive parser table, M , of the grammar the entries M [ S, id] and M [ R,$] respectively

Q. Consider the following translation scheme.
S > ER

R > * E{print{’ * ’);

R | f

E > F + E{print(’ + ’); | F F > (S) | id{print(id.value);}

Here id is a taken that represents an integer and id, value represents the corresponding integer value. For an input ‘2 * 3 + 4’, this translation scheme prints