Question
a.
efficiency and logic
b.
logic and reasoning
c.
richness and logic
d.
richness and reasoning
Posted under Web Technologies
Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment
Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.
Know the Explanation? Add it Here.
Q. There is a tradeoff needed for Semantic Web Language between
Similar Questions
Discover Related MCQs
Q. One of limitation of RDFS is unable to use properties like transitive, unique, or inverse due to lack of
View solution
Q. Acronym for FaCT is
View solution
Q. One of limitation of RDFS is unable to define disjoint property among classes due to lack of
View solution
Q. FaCT reasoner is build in
View solution
Q. OWL extends ideally
View solution
Q. One of utility that reasoning does not support is
View solution
Q. One of reasoner used in OWL is
View solution
Q. One of limitation of RDFS is unable to restrict number of values a property can take due to lack of
View solution
Q. A is an object of a class X and Y, both but classes X and Y is disjoint. This is called
View solution
Q. Description logics are a subset of
View solution
Q. One of limitation of RDFS is unable to use class combination properties like union, intersection, or complement due to lack of
View solution
Q. In OWL language, URI is defined as
View solution
Q. Metaclasses are
View solution
Q. Most specific class in OWL is
View solution
Q. Owl:ObjectProperty is a special case of
View solution
Q. Owl:EquivalentClass is always between
View solution
Q. Functional, symmetric, and inverse functional can only be applied to
View solution
Q. Most general class in OWL is
View solution
Q. Metaclasses is defined as
View solution
Q. Owl:sameAs is a synonym class to
View solution
Suggested Topics
Are you eager to expand your knowledge beyond Web Technologies? We've curated a selection of related categories that you might find intriguing.
Click on the categories below to discover a wealth of MCQs and enrich your understanding of Computer Science. Happy exploring!
.png)
