adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

When is the type 2 approach feasible for handling rapidly changing dimensions?

a.

When dimension attributes are kept flat

b.

When additional rows are created for each change

c.

When the number of rows in the dimension is small

d.

When the dimension table is fully denormalized

Answer: (a).When dimension attributes are kept flat Explanation:The type 2 approach is feasible for rapidly changing dimensions when dimension attributes are kept flat.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. When is the type 2 approach feasible for handling rapidly changing dimensions?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. How is the existence of multiple rows for the same customer in a rapidly changing dimension noticeable to end-users?

Q. What is one effective approach for handling large, rapidly changing dimensions in a data warehouse?

Q. What are "junk dimensions" in the context of data warehousing?

Q. Why is excluding and discarding all flags and textual data from dimension tables not a good option?

Q. What is the result of completely normalizing all dimension tables in a STAR schema?

Q. In a snowflake schema, how does the structure of dimension tables compare to a classic STAR schema?

Q. What is the primary benefit of using a snowflake schema in data warehousing?

Q. In a classic STAR schema, where is the fact table typically located in relation to dimension tables?

Q. In a data warehouse, why might you consider partially or fully normalizing dimension tables?

Q. When a user runs a query constraining only on product category, what is the advantage of indexing the product dimension table on product category?

Q. What is the primary reason for snowflaking dimension tables in a data warehouse?

Q. What is the typical net storage space savings achieved by snowflaking when the dimension table contains long text fields?

Q. What is one of the disadvantages of snowflaking in a data warehouse?

Q. In a data warehouse environment, what takes the highest significance, making snowflaking generally not recommended?

Q. In data warehousing, what is the primary principle behind snowflaking?

Q. When forming subdimensions in a data warehouse, what is one valid reason for separating out specific attributes into another table?

Q. What are aggregate fact tables in data warehousing?

Q. In data warehousing, what is the primary difference between queries run in an operational system and those run in a data warehouse environment?

Q. Which of the following queries would likely run the fastest in a data warehouse without using aggregate fact tables?

Q. When might aggregate fact tables be most helpful in improving query performance in a data warehouse?