adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why does cracking stop cracking a column for pieces smaller than L1 cache?

a.

Because smaller pieces are more efficient to search without reorganizing.

b.

Because smaller pieces pose a risk of data loss.

c.

Because smaller pieces cannot be cracked.

d.

Because smaller pieces have no performance benefit.

Posted under Big Data Computing

Answer: (a).Because smaller pieces are more efficient to search without reorganizing. Explanation:Cracking stops cracking a column for pieces smaller than L1 cache because smaller pieces are more efficient to search without reorganizing, and the benefit of cracking such small pieces is minimal.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why does cracking stop cracking a column for pieces smaller than L1 cache?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. In column-store systems, what allows for efficient query processing when requesting multiple columns of the same table?

Q. When a column is cracked in a column-store system, what happens to the alignment of columns within the same table?

Q. How does sideways cracking address the problem of misalignment in column-store systems when working with multiple columns of the same table?

Q. How does sideways cracking ensure alignment of column-pairs with the same head attribute?

Q. What is the benefit of sideways cracking in column-store systems when multiple columns of the same table are used in a query?

Q. What is the purpose of partial cracking in column-store systems?

Q. How does partial cracking manage storage space for cracking columns?

Q. How does cracking handle updates to the data?

Q. What is the purpose of the auxiliary delete and insert columns in cracking?

Q. How does cracking manage merging pending updates into cracking columns?

Q. What is the primary motivation for the introduction of adaptive merging as a complementary technique to cracking?

Q. How are data handled in adaptive merging after they are sorted in memory with a quicksort action?

Q. What happens if a query in adaptive merging is fully covered by the results column?

Q. How does adaptive merging improve over plain cracking in terms of convergence speed?

Q. What is the main advantage of the crack-sort hybrid compared to other hybrid algorithms?

Q. How does the performance of cracking depend on the arrival order of queries?

Q. What problem does stochastic cracking aim to solve?

Q. How does stochastic cracking work to reduce the chances of leaving back big uncracked pieces?

Q. Why is concurrent access to data challenging in the context of database cracking?

Q. How does database cracking achieve concurrency control for adaptive indexing during read queries?