adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

How do nonontological resources, such as conceptual schemas of databases and regulatory documents, contribute to ontology development?

a.

They replace the need for domain ontologies.

b.

They are primarily used for management activities.

c.

They speed up the ontology development process.

d.

They are not relevant to ontology development.

Posted under Big Data Computing

Answer: (c).They speed up the ontology development process. Explanation:Nonontological resources like conceptual schemas of databases and regulatory documents are valuable because they can accelerate the ontology development process. They provide essential information and context that can be incorporated into ontologies, making them more comprehensive and aligned with existing systems and standards.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. How do nonontological resources, such as conceptual schemas of databases and regulatory documents, contribute to ontology development?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. In the ontology development methodology, which activities are defined as in the METHONTOLOGY methodology?

Q. What is the purpose of the iterative lifecycle model used at the domain ontology level of ontology development?

Q. How is the development of the entire ontology network managed in the ontology development methodology?

Q. What is the initial focus when developing the ontology network at the ontology network level?

Q. What strategy is chosen for ontology conceptualization in the early implementation phase?

Q. How does the conceptualization activity start in the early implementation phase of ontology development?

Q. What is the purpose of the early implementation phase in ontology development?

Q. When are attributes of individuals of concepts typically added in the ontology implementation process?

Q. Why are ontologies commented in both Estonian and English languages during the implementation process?

Q. What is the current status of the ontology development methodology in Estonia?

Q. What is the planned improvement for the ontology development methodology in the future?

Q. What is the purpose of creating bindings between applications, data, and ontology elements in the context of ontologies?

Q. What are some of the initial applications of the Estonian semantic interoperability framework?

Q. Why is linking meta-data to artifacts themselves preferred in the context of ontologies?

Q. What are the three attributes defined by SAWSDL for expressing the semantics of schema elements?

Q. What constraint was imposed on the usage of SAWSDL in the Estonian e-government case study regarding the formal definition of semantic concepts?

Q. When are references to multiple ontologies allowed for describing the semantics of the same WSDL element in the Estonian e-government case study?

Q. What is the difference between top-level and bottom-level annotations in the context of SAWSDL?

Q. What is the main concern in services and data definitions from the annotation point of view?

Q. In Pattern 1 (URIdtp), when is a reference to a data-type property in an ontology sufficient for annotation?