adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What is the consequence of the lack of rational incentive for investing in ontology reuse?

a.

Increased interoperability and integration.

b.

Creation of a "Big Ontology" challenge.

c.

Rapid development of semantic technologies.

d.

Efficient knowledge management at scale.

Posted under Big Data Computing

Answer: (b).Creation of a "Big Ontology" challenge. Explanation:The lack of rational incentive for ontology reuse leads to the creation of a "Big Ontology" challenge.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What is the consequence of the lack of rational incentive for investing in ontology reuse?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the primary consequence of adding a data semantics layer to Big Data processing?

Q. What is one of the shortcomings of the unidirectional approach to developing the Big Data semantics layer?

Q. What is the primary challenge when ontologies are inconsistent with data?

Q. What is the advantage of an approach that combines top-down query answering with bottom-up ontology evolution?

Q. What is the primary characteristic of the proposed bottom-up path in the Big Data processing stack?

Q. What is a way to reduce the overheads of the top-down path in Big Data processing?

Q. What is the high-level approach for treating Big Data along the proposed path?

Q. What does the "3F" in the formula "3F + 3Co" primarily refer to in the context of the Big Data?

Q. What is one of the key purposes of the proposed bottom-up path in Big Data processing?

Q. Why is the order of focusing considered important when processing Big Data or its semantics?

Q. What is a potential advantage of using smart focusing when processing data tokens in a persistent storage?

Q. What is a challenge associated with smart focusing in data processing?

Q. What is the main purpose of filtering in data analysis?

Q. Why is it challenging to have a one-size-fits-all filter for big heterogeneous data?

Q. What is a potential benefit of using smart filtering in data analysis?

Q. How does the evolutionary approach address the challenge of smart filtering?

Q. What property of knowledge organisms in the evolutionary approach helps in filtering out noise?

Q. Why is it challenging to decide which part of a potentially useful collection of data should be sacrificed or "forgotten"?

Q. What is the drawback of following straightforward policies like fixed lifetime for keeping records in Big Data management?

Q. What is one potentially viable approach to forgetting in data management?