adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What is the most efficient approach for large switch blocks?

a.

Tree implementation

b.

Pointer table implementation

c.

Stack implementation

d.

None of the above

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (b).Pointer table implementation Explanation:The most efficient approach for large switch blocks is to generate a pointer table. The pointer table contains pointers to each of the code blocks in the switch statement, and the operand is used as an index into that pointer table to jump to the correct code block.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What is the most efficient approach for large switch blocks?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Where are pointer tables usually placed in the code section?

Q. Is a switch block pointer table a function call?

Q. Is the default block part of the pointer table?

Q. What is the most efficient approach to implement large switch blocks?

Q. What is the unique thing about table-based n-way conditionals?

Q. What is a binary tree search strategy used for in computer science?

Q. How are searchable items divided in a binary tree search strategy?

Q. What is the process for reaching individual items in a binary tree search strategy?

Q. How does the binary search implementation differ from the table implementation for switch blocks?

Q. What does the compiler do when the provided value is not found in a binary search implementation for switch blocks?

Q. What is a common quality of tree-based n-way conditionals that makes them easier to identify in disassembled code?

Q. How does a binary tree search work?

Q. How does the compiler determine which case block to jump into when using a tree-based n-way conditional?

Q. What is the difference between pretested and posttested loops?

Q. What are pretested loops?

Q. Why are pretested loops less efficient than posttested ones?

Q. What is the potential risk of using a pretested loop with an out-of-bounds counter value?

Q. How does the compiler handle a pretested loop when the counter value comes from an external source?

Q. What is the purpose of the unconditional jump at the end of a pretested loop?

Q. What is the potential risk with the implementation of a pretested loop?