adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why is decompiling bytecode languages such as Java and .NET MSIL more manageable?

a.

Because the input representation of the program includes highly detailed information regarding the program and its data

b.

Because bytecode languages are simpler than native binaries

c.

Because bytecode languages are designed specifically for decompilation

d.

Because decompilers are able to generate high-level language representations directly from bytecode without needing to analyze machine language code

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (a).Because the input representation of the program includes highly detailed information regarding the program and its data Explanation:Bytecode languages such as Java and .NET MSIL include highly detailed information regarding the program, particularly regarding the data it deals with. This makes decompilation of bytecode languages more manageable than decompilation of native binaries.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why is decompiling bytecode languages such as Java and .NET MSIL more manageable?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the intermediate representation generated by compilers?

Q. What is the primary argument against native decompilation?

Q. What is the primary counterargument that decompiler writers use?

Q. What is the limitation of the generated high-level language code?

Q. What is the main challenge for decompilation?

Q. What is a decompiler?

Q. What is the front end of a decompiler responsible for?

Q. What is the back end of a decompiler responsible for?

Q. What is the purpose of improving the intermediate representation of the program?

Q. What is the key difference between a decompiler and a compiler?

Q. What is the purpose of an intermediate representation in decompilation?

Q. How are intermediate representations different from typical low-level instruction sets?

Q. Do all decompilers use a single intermediate representation for the entire process?

Q. What are intermediate representations in decompilation?

Q. Why do intermediate representations typically have a small instruction set?

Q. What is an assignment instruction in decompilation?

Q. What is the purpose of the Push instruction in decompilation?

Q. What is the purpose of the Pop instruction in decompilation?

Q. What is the purpose of the Call instruction in decompilation?

Q. What is the purpose of the Ret instruction in decompilation?