adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Why is heavy inlining used in Defender?

a.

To make the program run faster

b.

To decrease the program's memory usage

c.

To complicate reversing in general and cracking in particular

d.

To make the program more readable

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (c).To complicate reversing in general and cracking in particular Explanation:Inlining significantly complicates reversing in general and cracking in particular because it’s difficult to tell where you are in the target program—clearly defined function calls really make it easier for reversers.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Why is heavy inlining used in Defender?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is dongle protection?

Q. Why is generating decryption keys in runtime important?

Q. What is the disadvantage of user-input-based decryption keys?

Q. What would make cracking Defender more difficult?

Q. Why was the Chained Block Cipher in Defender crackable?

Q. What is the purpose of dongle protection?

Q. How does Defender generate decryption keys?

Q. What is a cryptographic hash algorithm?

Q. How does Defender use interdependent keys?

Q. What are interdependent keys?

Q. What is the advantage of generating decryption keys in runtime?

Q. What should be done with the verification thread in a commercial product environment?

Q. Why should the actual checksum verifications be inlined?

Q. What is the purpose of adding periodical checksum calculations from the main thread?

Q. What priority should the verification thread be set to in a commercial product environment?

Q. What changes should be made to the counter constant in a commercial product environment?

Q. Is the current implementation of the verification thread safe for commercial use?

Q. What modifications can be made to a time-stamp verification thread to make it more difficult to remove?

Q. What would happen if the encryption on each key function was not implemented in the Processor Time-Stamp Verification Thread?

Q. Why is it important to directly access the hardware time-stamp counter using a low-level instruction in the Processor Time-Stamp Verification Thread?