Question
a.
Because ordering transformations are irrelevant for automated obfuscation tools
b.
Because many program operations are codependent
c.
Because it would reduce code size
d.
Because it would improve runtime performance
Posted under Reverse Engineering
Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment
Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.
Know the Explanation? Add it Here.
Q. Why is it not always possible to change the order of operations in a program?
Similar Questions
Discover Related MCQs
Q. Who would find ordering transformations more relevant?
View solution
Q. What is the benefit of shuffling the order of operations in a program?
View solution
Q. What are data transformations in obfuscation?
View solution
Q. Why do data transformations make sense in obfuscation?
View solution
Q. What is an example of modifying variable encoding?
View solution
Q. Why is modifying variable encoding better applied at the binary level?
View solution
Q. What is restructuring arrays?
View solution
Q. What are some forms of restructuring arrays?
View solution
Q. What is the purpose of restructuring arrays?
View solution
Q. Can an automated deobfuscator reconstruct the original layout of the array after it has been restructured?
View solution
Q. What is the most significant penalty incurred by most antireversing techniques?
View solution
Q. What does the magnitude of investment in antireversing measures eventually boil down to?
View solution
Q. What is obfuscation?
View solution
Q. What is a deobfuscator?
View solution
Q. What is the associated cost of an obfuscating transformation?
View solution
Q. What are opaque predicates?
View solution
Suggested Topics
Are you eager to expand your knowledge beyond Reverse Engineering? We've curated a selection of related categories that you might find intriguing.
Click on the categories below to discover a wealth of MCQs and enrich your understanding of Computer Science. Happy exploring!
