adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

What is the difference between confusing an automated deobfuscator and confusing a human reverser?

a.

There is no difference

b.

Automated deobfuscators can be confused by concurrency-based opaque predicates, whereas human reversers cannot

c.

Automated deobfuscators can easily identify fishy-looking threads, whereas human reversers cannot

d.

Automated deobfuscators can easily identify fake control flow statements, whereas human reversers cannot

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (b).Automated deobfuscators can be confused by concurrency-based opaque predicates, whereas human reversers cannot Explanation:The difference between confusing an automated deobfuscator and confusing a human reverser is that automated deobfuscators can be confused by concurrency-based opaque predicates, whereas human reversers cannot.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. What is the difference between confusing an automated deobfuscator and confusing a human reverser?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. What is the main challenge for an automated deobfuscator in identifying concurrency-based opaque predicates?

Q. How do computation transformations reduce the readability of code?

Q. What are aggregation transformations?

Q. What are ordering transformations?

Q. In which type of programs are opaque predicates more effective?

Q. What is the primary goal of most bytecode obfuscators?

Q. What is one trick that bytecode obfuscators use to confuse decompilers?

Q. Why can adding goto statements into the bytecode break a program's flow graph?

Q. Why is decompilation in native processor languages such as IA-32 machine code complex and fragile?

Q. What is a table interpretation layout obfuscation approach?

Q. What is the purpose of using a table interpretation layout for obfuscation?

Q. How does a table interpretation layout obfuscation approach hide the structure of the code?

Q. What is the role of the jump table in a table interpretation layout obfuscation approach?

Q. What is table interpretation in the context of obfuscation?

Q. How does table interpretation obfuscation make code more difficult to read?

Q. What is an enhancement that can be added to table interpretation obfuscation?

Q. What is the purpose of using pointer aliases in obfuscation?

Q. How do pointer aliases complicate data-flow analysis?

Q. What is inlining in the context of compiler optimization?

Q. How does inlining help in obfuscating transformations?