adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Which type of disassembler is more reliable and tolerant of antidisassembly tricks?

a.

Linear sweep disassembler

b.

Recursive traversal disassembler

c.

Both disassemblers are equally reliable

d.

It depends on the specific antidisassembly trick being used

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (b).Recursive traversal disassembler Explanation:Recursive traversal disassemblers are more reliable and are far more tolerant of various antidisassembly tricks.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Which type of disassembler is more reliable and tolerant of antidisassembly tricks?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Which of the following is NOT a potential effect of confusing disassemblers?

Q. What is an opaque predicate?

Q. What is the difference between linear sweep and recursive traversal disassemblers?

Q. Which disassemblers can properly disassemble code with opaque predicates?

Q. What is the purpose of the pseudorandom values in the macro?

Q. Why is the LINE macro used in the macro?

Q. What is the potential downside of using too many copies of this macro in a program?

Q. Are these techniques effective at deterring experienced and determined reversers from reversing or cracking an application?

Q. What is the recommended approach for implementing powerful antireversing techniques?

Q. What is code obfuscation?

Q. What is potency in code obfuscation?

Q. What is a deobfuscator?

Q. What is the primary goal of many obfuscators?

Q. What is the associated cost of an obfuscating transformation?

Q. What is the primary goal of code obfuscation?

Q. What is potency in the context of code obfuscation?

Q. What is the primary advantage of automatic code obfuscation?

Q. What are control flow transformations?

Q. What are computation transformations aimed at achieving?

Q. How do aggregation transformations affect the high-level structure of a program?