adplus-dvertising
frame-decoration

Question

Which programs could deal with the special sectors created in media-based protections?

a.

Programs that required users to activate the software online

b.

Programs that used a hardware device to secure the software

c.

Programs that could duplicate the special sectors

d.

Programs that used a serial number to authenticate software

Posted under Reverse Engineering

Answer: (c).Programs that could duplicate the special sectors Explanation:Several programs were written that could deal with these special sectors and actually try to duplicate them as well. Two popular ones were CopyWrite and Transcopy.

Engage with the Community - Add Your Comment

Confused About the Answer? Ask for Details Here.

Know the Explanation? Add it Here.

Q. Which programs could deal with the special sectors created in media-based protections?

Similar Questions

Discover Related MCQs

Q. Are programs that duplicate the special sectors in media-based protections legal?

Q. What is the purpose of using serial numbers in software?

Q. How does the installation program verify the validity of a serial number?

Q. Why is relying exclusively on a plain serial number flawed?

Q. What is the impact of the internet on the effectiveness of serial numbers as a protection mechanism?

Q. What is a challenge response in the context of software copy protection mechanisms?

Q. What is the difference between the original serial number protection scheme and the challenge response scheme?

Q. How does the challenge response scheme provide usage information to the software vendor?

Q. How do pirates typically crack the challenge response protection scheme?

Q. What is a dongle?

Q. What is the purpose of a dongle-based protection?

Q. How does a trivial implementation of a dongle-based protection work?

Q. What is the solution employed by dongle developers to make their protection scheme more secure?

Q. How does a dongle-based protection scheme work?

Q. How does an emulator program work?

Q. How can an emulator program be used to crack a dongle-based protection scheme?

Q. What is the purpose of hardware-based protection schemes?

Q. Why is the most trivial implementation of a dongle-based protection scheme vulnerable?

Q. How do some dongle developers prevent the decrypted version of the code from being ripped from memory?

Q. What is the advantage of including an actual encryption engine within the dongle?